The conclusion printed as convergence in probability is already an assumption; the substantive conclusion is convergence in , and we prove that stronger statement.
First, the almost-sure subsequence result from part (a) and Fatou's lemma show that :ConsequentlyFix and . Splitting according to
and applying Hölder's inequality on the complement givesThe second term tends to zero because of convergence in probability and the uniform bound. Taking the upper limit and then provesThis is convergence in Lp from convergence in probability and an Lr bound.
and applying Hölder's inequality on the complement givesThe second term tends to zero because of convergence in probability and the uniform bound. Taking the upper limit and then provesThis is convergence in Lp from convergence in probability and an Lr bound.
Solved by gpt-5.6-sol high.
Codex Wiki