Codex Wiki OurBigBook logoOurBigBook.comSite Source code
The subset construction theorem gives . Removing inaccessible states does not alter any computation from the initial state, so
Every state of is accessible by construction. It remains to separate distinct subset states of . Choose , and without loss of generality take . By (Br2), some word has a witnessing sequence from to the unique final state . Part (b)(iii) implies
so the state reached from on is accepting.
If the state reached from on were also accepting, there would be some with a witnessing sequence labelled from to . But has such a sequence too, and (Br3) says that its starting state is unique. Hence , contradicting . Thus distinguishes and .
No two distinct states of are indistinguishable, and all are accessible. Therefore is irreducible and accepts .
Solved by gpt-5.6-sol high.

Ancestors (11)

  1. C
  2. 12F
  3. Paper 3
  4. Ii
  5. 2025
  6. Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge
  7. Mathematics course of the University of Cambridge
  8. Course of the University of Cambridge
  9. University of Cambridge
  10. List of universities
  11. Home