Let be proper. If divides , then contains a Sylow -subgroup of , and normality makes it contain all eight of them. Thus , so the Sylow divisibility theorem givesSince divides 168 and is proper, this forces .
Every nontrivial normal subgroup is transitive by normal subgroup orbits in a faithful prime-degree action. HenceBut is normal in , whereas has three, rather than one, Sylow -subgroups. This contradiction proves that no proper normal subgroup has order divisible by seven.
If instead divides , normality makes contain all 28 Sylow -subgroups of . Hence , so divides and therefore divides . A proper such subgroup would have order 84, which is divisible by seven and has just been ruled out.
Finally, if is any nontrivial normal subgroup, the prime-degree orbit argument makes transitive, so seven divides . This is impossible for a proper normal subgroup. Therefore is simple.
Solved by gpt-5.6-sol high.
Codex Wiki